Life in progress

E is for … Experience

21 Comments

They say, ‘write what you know,’ but does that mean if you’re not an astronaut, you can’t write about astronauts? Okay, maybe it helps, but that’s what research is for. Personally, I take the rule of, ‘write what you know’ a little more loosely than that.

Take, for instance, yesterday’s post where I used the example, ‘The steamy kitchen reeked like a wet cat,’ when showing what better detail looked like. Had anyone asked me what a wet cat smells like, I would have had to tell them that I honestly have no idea. I’ve never owned a cat, let alone a wet one. In other words, I think it’s the details where our experience really comes in handy.

Having said that, not all things can really be described. 99.9% of us have had at least a sip of water, but can you describe the taste? And take, for instance, what it’s like to urinate. We’ve all (100% of us this time I think) done it, but if I’m writing from the point of view of a male, I’m unable to accurately describe the action of doing so standing up. Does that mean I shouldn’t write from the male perspective? Again, research comes in handy. I can ask other people (preferably male ones) to tell me what it’s like, but I still won’t have had the experience. And so I’ll probably never write a story in which my male character is dealing with bladder issues. Either that or, like the wet cat, I’ll get good at faking it.

My novel takes place in a real city: Kingston, Ontario, Canada. I don’t live there, but I’ve been there many times, and thought I knew the place well enough to be able to set a story there. Said story written, I decided to take the time to vacation there for a few days by myself, to really do some research, and I was amazed at what I gleaned. Because my characters get off the train there at the beginning of the novel, the station was one of my obvious places to visit. I sat to wait for the westbound train and whist there, noted the colours of the waiting room seats, the landscape outside – even the way the doors worked. When the train stopped I watched to see which track it was on, so I knew my characters would disembark on the nearside of the station rather than having to take the underground passage to get across. All of this will come to perhaps a sentence or two in the novel, but I believe it will add to the feel, as well as have the people who live in Kingston nodding in agreement when they read my book. I could never have accomplished this from information I took from Wikipedia; I had to experience it for myself.

Other life experiences from my past also often manage to creep into my stories. What comes through most vividly for my characters to experience are the wonders of nature I have had the gift of being part of.  There’s nothing quite like the quiet of a country field on a snowy night, or the singing of cicadas on a sweltering summer afternoon. These are the things that make fiction come to life. Real life.

Can you tell when something is contrived in a story?

 

For today’s A-Z Fiction, please click here: http://lindaghillfiction.wordpress.com/2014/04/05/e-is-for-elementary-dear-jupiter/

Unknown's avatar

Author: Linda G. Hill

There's a writer in here, clawing her way out.

21 thoughts on “E is for … Experience

  1. melissajanda's avatar

    Some of the first books I read on writing said “thou must write only what one knows!” but many of the writing books I’ve read lately scoff at that and say to write what you feel. I tend to agree. I think of the phrase “write what you know” as meaning “make it feel authentic,” not necessarily that you had to personally experience it. Einstein said, “imagination is more powerful than knowledge. Knowledge is limited, but imagination encircles the world.” (or something like that, paraphrasing here), so why limit yourself? We’re writers. We make stuff up! Great post!

    Like

  2. joey's avatar

    I suppose I can’t tell if it’s contrived…
    My E is also experience, today, but completely unrelated to your post.

    Like

  3. frannystevenson's avatar

    Actually I agree with you..as usual! For some details you have to have personal experience, but for other things you can do with research!
    And yet you cannot hope to know everything…I wish I could!

    Like

  4. iWrightPro's avatar

    I always worry about these types of things, so many people do indeed say “write what you know” but what I do myself and what I write about tend to be polar opposites. This then causes tension when I write anything because I’d stress over whether or not it was immersive enough to be believable. Loved your comparisons and exceptions to this, though!

    Dropping in from A to Z.The Next Chapter

    Like

    • Linda G. Hill's avatar

      Thanks very much! I’m pretty tense myself over the things I need to look more deeply into. I’m looking at having to do interviews with a huge amount of trepidation! But, it’s gotta be done.

      Thanks for reading! 🙂 Is your A-Z one continuous story or unrelated chapters?

      Like

  5. If I Won Powerball's avatar

    I agree with Doobster – I personally don’t like when I know the area in a book and what they are describing is all off. I would much prefer they create a fictional place rather than a specific city and make up the actual surroundings and such. I think research is important – how can you convey a feeling or scene into words when you don’t know what it is you are describing. Did that make sense? LOL

    PS – Although I personally have no desire to be a man, I would love the luxury of their urinating abilities. Just throwing that out there – pee dots and all 😉

    Like

    • Linda G. Hill's avatar

      It does make sense and it’s absolutely true. A heck of a lot of research needs to go into anything an author isn’t sure about, otherwise it just comes off as though they didn’t really care about their subject matter.

      And it would be soo much easier to stand up – I agree!. 😉

      Like

  6. Private's avatar

    Good post. I remember once reading a book that took place in Washington, DC. I resided in DC at the time, and I was put off when the author got a lot of the details of the city wrong, often having outdoor action taking place at intersections on streets that don’t actually intersect in the city.

    By the way, should you ever wish to describe what urinating from a male perspective is, you might want to read this.

    Like

    • Linda G. Hill's avatar

      Getting facts like intersecting streets, which is something that can be found on a map, is intolerable as far as I’m concerned. It’s simply lazy.

      Thanks very much for the link. I’ll check it out. 🙂

      Like

Leave a reply to melissajanda Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.