This post is part of Just Jot it January, and the prompt word, “philosophy,” is brought to us by Sadje. Check out her blog here!
I’ve strayed away from it, but at one time, I closely followed the teachings of the Tao Te Ching.
The philosophy of Taoism makes a lot of sense to me.
Chapter 11
Thirty spokes share one central hub; it is the empty space within that makes the carriage useful.
Clay is molded to form a vessel; it is the empty space within that makes the vessel useful.Doors and windows are cut out to make a room; it is the empty space within that makes the room useful.
Therefore, while substance (Being) offers the benefit, emptiness (Non-being) offers the utility.
As a way to apply this to life, think about living in the present; emptying the mind of thoughts of the past and worries of the future allows a person to fully concentrate on what they’re doing, making their actions more controlled and therefore more useful to the moment.
Something worth thinking about.
This philosophical post is part of Just Jot it January! Want to join in? Just click here to get to the prompt and drop your link in the comments. It’s fun!
Thanks again to Sadje for today’s word of the day!
lindaghill.com 
January 17, 2026 at 12:32 am
It is, of course, literally impossible to live in the present, for we are doomed to always live in the past. Though not very far in the past, for the most part. If living is consciousness, and I think it is basically that for a sentient being, then every event of which we are conscious occurred some time in the past – even the thought itself, as it takes time for the experience to be perceived and interpreted by our consciousness and our brains (which don’t seem to be the same thing), so the experience of being hit on the head by a brick is interpreted fairly quickly, whilst in spotting a distant star in the night sky we may be witnessing (experiencing) an event millions of years into the past.
And what about walking through a field on a misty evening and seeing an animal in the distance – we begin to recognise it as a dog looking to its left. Gradually we can make out the shape of its ears and nose and we are sure that it is a cattle dog of some sort poised and ready to chase something. But when we get closer we realise that it isn’t a dog at all, but a tree stump. The lack of light, the distance, our eyes and our brains have transpired against us to create a false impression.
But here’s the question. At the point that we were sure it was a dog were we really experiencing (in the past) a dog or a tree stump? And at what point can we be absolutely certain that it IS a tree stump? Can we be absolutely certain about anything at all?
So we can only ever live in the past, and we can’t even be sure that the past is what we think it is.
LikeLike
January 17, 2026 at 12:25 am
I love this philosophy Linda. Thanks
LikeLike
January 16, 2026 at 11:04 pm
Yes! Definitely food for thought Linda! ❤
LikeLike